"Political Animal" column - A sentinel sounds an alarm - by Bill Kling
"Watchman, what of the night?" is an Old Testament question [Isaiah
21:11] that might've been asked of Adm. John B. Nathman last month as he took
command of the U.S. Navy's air units in the far-flung Pacific Fleet.
Nathman's answer, in remarks at the Aug. 23 command-change ceremony,
should be troubling to us and to our Prince William County neighbors serving
in the armed forces.
The admiral warned there's "a fundamental disconnect" between what we
require of our Navy today "and the willingness of the richest nation on earth
to pay for its demands."
"It is obvious the naval service is undervalued," Nathman told 1,000
sailors, Marines and civilians on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier
Constellation berthed at North Island Naval Air Station in San Diego.
"This is the challenge," he declared. "It must be resolved."
In his new post, Nathman oversees personnel, maintenance and training of
all naval aviation units from the Mississippi River west to the Indian Ocean.
That includes six aircraft carriers and 79 naval aviation squadrons.
That makes Nathman's warning, circulating by e-mail among active-duty and
retired military types, as courageous as it's timely. A political campaign's
afoot with the White House, a third of the U.S. Senate and all of the U.S.
House of Representatives on the line.
And when current campaign discussions turn to the readiness of our armed
forces to defend us and our national interests, Democrats and Republicans
alike seem rhetorically hell-bent on parroting the deceptive Wizard of Oz -
"Don't listen to that man behind the curtain."
The day before Nathman's speech, Vice President Albert Gore, the
Democrats' nominee for president, told the American people everything's
simply hunky-dory with our national defense. He was responding to
allegations by his GOP opponent, Texas Gov. George W. Bush, that our military
is lagging seriously behind what's really needed in training and technology
to keep us secure in the decades ahead.
Then Defense Secretary Bill Cohen, a putative Republican and former U.S.
senator from Maine who spent some of his time on Capitol Hill authoring a
novel, said large cuts in the national defense budget began when Bush's
father was president.
Cohen didn't mention that he, as a member of the Senate Armed Services
Committee, was among those in Congress demanding those cuts. Or that
families of thousands of enlisted personnel are obliged to subsist on federal
food stamps.
Nathman has reason to know these devious ways of our nation's capital.
Before his current command, he was director of the Navy's air warfare,
overseeing aviation policy and programs. There, he was in a position to
observe firsthand how the cynical, self-serving politics of our national
leaders often adversely and sometimes dangerously affect the men and women
standing guard in a still-perilous world.
"There are two fundamental issues we should understand - demand and
value, " said Nathman, a 1970 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy who has
flown more than 3,600 hours in 40 types of aircraft and has made more than
750 carrier landings.
"This nation - its president and its citizens - demand global stability;
demand a world inclined to democratic ideals and countries that will protect
the rights of their citizens.
"There is a valid need for a global economy, one that the United States
intends to lead. There's a need for constrained oil pricing. There's a need
for a community of nations that can deal effectively with rogue states and
bullies - this is what the U.S. Navy does.
"The value of the naval service is its willingness to do its duty to meet
the nation's demands. We will be asked - no ordered - to train, deploy and
engage. We engage diplomatically with our forward presence and, if
necessary, in combat to sustain those demands.
"Is it not right then that our men and women have demands too?
"Isn't it right that the pilots and aircrew we send daily into harm's way
have modern and capable aircraft?
"Isn't it right that our young men and women expect to work in efficient,
clean, connected and even new hangers [sic] and work spaces?
"Isn't it right that my naval air force be sustained at levels which
support our operations and tempo?
"Isn't it right that our sailors and their families are paid enough to
live in dignity?
"To me, the fact is that we have reached such a low level of funding it
will soon be impossible to meet the expectations of this nation in executing
our operational tasks and completing the mission."
On target, sir.

 

 

70.gif (3783 bytes)

This page was last updated on 05/23/04.
Comments to Nick Visco
Hosted by FreeNet
hostedbyfreenet.gif (2944 bytes)